![]() In other words, if you incorporate expressive devices such as rubato into your playing, the chances are you’ll end up with an unreadable score full of odd note lengths. What they won’t do, as a rule, is analyse this MIDI data to sift the wheat of the actual score from the chaff of the player’s interpretation. Most notation packages, and of course all DAWs that support notation, will let you play or record a MIDI performance, and represent the notes you play on one or more staves. They’ve been less successful, however, in tackling the reverse challenge. Over the years, notation packages such as Sibelius and Finale have got better at mimicking the interpretation that might be applied by human performers, so as to make score playback more realistic. ![]() No matter how many expression markings you add to a score, it still leaves a great deal to the interpretative skills of the player. Any form of musical notation inevitably represents a drastic simplification of a musical performance. Witness, for instance, the excitement that was generated by Celemony’s Melodyne DNA, which seemed almost to defy the laws of physics in its ability to perform polyphonic pitch correction.įor my money, though, one of the most impressive technological achievements of recent years is one that has no audible aspects whatsoever. When we think of revolutionary developments in music technology, the ones that spring to mind are those that do previously unheard–of things to sound. DoReMIR’s unique program helps to bridge the gap between performance and musical score - and it’s free!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |